Abstract: Discussions are underway among educationalists on Outcome-Based Education (OBE) as the country changed its status from a provisional member of the Washington Accord to a permanent signatory in 2014 and decided to follow Outcome-Based Education and Accreditation (OBEA) in all Engineering Institutions. It is becoming mandatory for all Engineering Institutions in India to put into practice OBE in all respects. Consequently, concerns are raised at various segments, mainly in understanding the concept, exploring various elements and the possibilities of implementing it. Since AICTE has taken initiatives to put into practice this approach, there is a stereotypic notion among many educationalists that OBE is applicable only to Engineering Education. Scholars from Arts and Science disciplines do not bother about the need for OBE and/or sometimes tend to think that it is an extra burden to introduce such new initiatives into collegiate education. Some educationalists understand OBE in a very shallow way, purely in terms of the end-product and ignore the various other factors and the process that collectively constitute OBE. Taking into consideration the various problems facing the Indian Higher Education and, evaluating the practical difficulties in applying OBE, this paper outlines an OBE model for social sciences.
1. Bethany Hiatt (2006). Ravlich back down over OBE rollout, The West Australian, retrieved from http://www.platowa.com
2. Brandt, R. (1994). On Creating an Environment Where All Students Learn: A Conversation with Al Mamary. Educational Leadership, 51, 5: 18–23.
3. Drake S.M., Burns R.C. (2004). Meeting Standards through Integrated Curriculum, Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD).
4. Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of Mind. New York: Basic Book Inc.
5. Gardner, H. (1999) Intelligence reframed: Multiple intelligences for the 21st century. New York: Basic Books.
6. Janetius, S.T. & Mini, T. C. (2013). Managing institutes of higher education and the strive for excellence - a case study, Rathinam Journal of Management, Vol.1, (3)1-6.
7. Janetius, S.T. & Mini, T.C. (2015). Quo Vadis College Campus? Glimpses of Higher Education in India, Thrissur: MiShil & Js Publishers.
8. Janetius, S.T., & Shilpa, S. T. (2016). Lacuna in skills development leading to unemployability - a case study, International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), Vol. 5 (10). 1957-1959.
9. Janetius, S.T., Padmanabhan, R. & Mini, T.C. (2016). Engaged Employees in Institutes of Higher Education, International Journal of Advanced Research, 4 (11). 308-312.
10. Killen, R. (2000). Teaching Strategies for Outcomes-based Education. Unpublishedmanuscript. Newcastle, Australia: University of Newcastle. Retrieved on Dec. 27,2016.
11. MHRD (2015). Annual Report Annual Report 2014-15, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Government of India.
12. Mini, T.C. & Janetius, S.T. (2013). Choice of Field of Study in Higher Education and Career Decision, Management Wisdom, Vol.2, (1). 25-35.
13. Mini, T.C. (2015). Managing Students in Institutes of Higher Education and the need for Multicultural Competency, Management Wisdom, Vol.4, (1). 16-22.
14. Popham, J. W. (2008). Transformative Assessment,Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD)
15. Rao, V.V. (2015). Outcome based education and accreditation, Chennai: Notion Press.
16. Spady, W. & Marshall, K. (1991). Beyond Traditional Outcome-Based Education, Educational Leadership, 49, 2: 67-72.
17. Spady, W. (1994). Choosing Outcomes of Significance, Educational Leadership, 51, 5: 18-23.
18. Spady, W. (1994). Outcome-based education: Critical issues and answers, Arlington, VA: American Association of School Administrators.
19. Spady, W. (1998). Paradigm lost: Reclaiming America’s educational future. Arlington, VA: American Association of School Administrators.
20. Vickery, T.R. (1990). ODDM: A Workable Model for Total School Improvement. Educational Leadership, 47, 7: 67–71.