Dr Janetius Speaks
Read some of his writings

Phenomenological counseling

Phenomenological Approach to Human Condition in

Counselling and Psychotherapy

Dr. Thomas Janetius

(Paper presented in the International Conference on ‘Phenomenology of Human Condition’ held at Dharmaram Vidya Kshetram, Bangalore, India on June 23-25, 2003)

My interest in applying phenomenology to counselling and psychotherapy started very recently. During my doctoral research among the indigenous people in the Cordillera Mountains in the Philippines, while studying their health concepts and healing practices and life-world, I realised that the Western patterns of identifying and classifying mental illness and behavioural problems do not fit well in their life-world. Although many of their sicknesses could be classified as ‘psychosomatic sickness’ from a Western therapeutic perspective, a closer look proved different. Due to the uniqueness of their experiences and life-world, I conceptualised some of their sicknesses as ‘pneumasomatic’ (Janetius, 2003). From then on, my approach to counselling and psychotherapy took a dramatic change; from a cross-cultural perspective to culture-specific approach. To this effect, phenomenology came to my rescue. This paper is a first step from my part to conceptualise what I think, my philosophy of counselling and psychotherapy.

Introduction

The history of medicine started with a fusion of facts, folklore, and superstitions. Counselling and psychotherapy evolved from ministrations of priests, shamans, magicians, soothsayers and witch doctors of the ancient world. Understanding the human condition subjectively, these traditional healers attempted to determine the causes of both physical and emotional distress. Krippner (1988) identifies that behaviour therapy, hypnotherapy, psychodrama, NLP etc., are closely parallel to the traditional native healing methods. Contemporary psychotherapy that took a new shape from Sigmund Freud and his concept religion is infantile neurosis paved way to rule out many subjective experiences. Besides this, under the pretext of being very scientific in its approach, contemporary psychology has compartmentalised human condition and evaded subjective spiritual, religious or faith experiences that are inscribed in the minds of many people.

Today psychologists have become aware of the importance of taking a client’s cultural background into account when assessing the problem and determining treatment. Scholars recognize that most therapies are based on Western systems of psychology, which stress the desirability of individualism and independence. However, cultures of Asia emphasize different values, such as conformity, dependency on others, and obeying one's parents etc. Techniques that might be effective in the West or similar cultures might be inappropriate for a client from India. Therefore there is a call among psychologists to situate subjective experiences of human beings and behaviour. As Frie (2003) points out, "with the advent of post-modernism, the unity of the individual mind, the notion of an objectivity, knowable world, and the view of language as the carrier of truth have all been implicitly or explicitly rejected…(in contrast) postmodernism asserts that the person, or subject, is not only shaped, but also subverted by the contexts in which it exists" (p.2). In order to understand human conditions of clients for effective therapy, therapists must be aware of their own cultural biases and adapt a phenomenological outlook.

Counselling and Psychotherapy

It’s hard to differentiate counselling and psychotherapy. Counselling psychology that became popular after World War II served relatively healthy clients who experience difficulties related to interpersonal relationships, adjustment difficulties, life crises and stresses. On the other hand, psychotherapy dealt with severely disturbed individuals. Today this distinction between psychotherapy and counselling is quite vague and often used interchangeably. Psychotherapists and counsellors often treat the same kinds of problems with the same set of techniques. However, a slim difference that can still be made between counselling and psychotherapy would be: counselling is less intensive and more focused toward listening, direction setting, and issues that don't require in-depth analysis where as psychotherapy is more on dealing with emotional problems, neurosis, and more of therapy focused.

In the Indian context, many a times advice and similar help offered by pastors, community leaders and social workers who have little or no training at all in specific fields of counselling or guidance or therapy often claim their informal help or advice as counselling and therapy. Counselling and Psychotherapy differs from such bare-foot or pseudo-counsellors. First and foremost, counselling and psychotherapy is not about advice giving. Secondly, counselling and psychotherapy in their truest sense are establishing working relationships by a trained, certified clinician in which treatment methods and techniques are guided by well-developed theoretical framework. The client comes with a presenting problem; the therapist and patient establish a working relationship; the therapist defines the problem and once defined suggests solution.

Acceptance or approval for psychology, counselling and psychotherapy is wanting in India. Mental illness and psychological disturbance of a person are not considered common human illness, and so there are stigma attached to people who seek counselling and psychotherapy. Even people who seek therapy and counselling are often afraid to talk in public about their therapy because of social backlash. Western and developed countries are far advanced in accepting psychotherapy and counselling as much needed fields of science and medicine that such stigma seen in Indian culture associated with people seeking counselling and psychotherapy are not seen there. It is, however, true to say that even in the Asian societies such discrimination and stigma have decreased significantly. Seeking therapeutic assistance for emotional and similar problems is slowly becoming common phenomenon even in India and other Eastern societies.

Over the last few decades the field of counselling and psychotherapy expanded enormously in the number of approaches, the numbers of people enter the profession and the numbers of clients opt for therapeutic assistance. Before 1950, psychoanalysis, the therapy module started by Sigmund Freud that focused on the unconscious, early childhood experiences and the inner world of the client were virtually the only form of psychotherapy. In the later years many theorists have developed many other psychodynamic therapies, some even significantly different from Freud’s original techniques. In the 1950s and 1960s behavioural therapies that focus more on the learning, stimulus-response interactions emerged as a second force. In the latter years humanistic-existential therapies known otherwise phenomenological therapies came as third force in psychology. In the recent years, transpersonal approaches are becoming a strong force. As the number of approaches to therapy grew, the practice of psychotherapy and counselling spread from clinical to non-clinical settings, which was conducive to its becoming popular all over the world today. In India, although counselling has not penetrated the non-clinical settings like schools, industries and similar areas, the future is very encouraging.

Both in counselling and psychotherapy, treatment of individuals with emotional problems, behavioural problems, or mental illness is primarily done through verbal communications, although there is a move in America to introduce some kind of pharmacy training to psychotherapists. In most types of therapy, a person discusses his or her problems one-on-one basis with a therapist, the therapist tries to understand the person's problems and to help change the distressing thoughts, feelings, or behaviours. Besides such individual therapy group therapy or group session is also common therapeutic modality, where a therapist or a group of therapists facilitate a group of people.

Today there are more than 250 kinds of therapy, but only a fraction of these have found mainstream acceptance. Most dominant therapeutic approaches could be classified as (1) psychodynamic, (2) behavioural, (3) cognitive, (4) existential-humanistic, and (5) eclectic.

Psychodynamic approaches focus on the anxiety provoking situations, unconscious mechanisms and early childhood experiences to identify cliental problems. Dream analysis and free association of clients’ thoughts are some of the traditional techniques. As against the concept of Freudian unconscious, behavioural approaches focus on the observable and measurable behaviours. All our behaviours are learned so we can unlearn; based on this principle, the behaviourists help individuals to replace the distressing behaviours with more appropriate ones. Cognitive approaches emphasize the beliefs and thoughts. Irrational beliefs or distorted thinking patterns can cause a variety of problems that lead to mental and behavioural problems and the therapists direct people to think more rational, constructive ways. Humanistic-existential approaches focus on the client's present life situation, aspirations and motivations in understanding, shaping and modifying behaviour. Therapists show empathy and care to facilitate clients toward personal realizations and decision-making, take responsibility for their actions, to accept themselves, and to recognize their own potential for growth and change. Eclectic therapy is an integrative approach of one or more theories and therapies put together. Today many therapists prefer this approach.

Phenomenology

Phenomenology is a philosophical perspective as well as an approach to qualitative research. Husserl understands phenomenology as a discipline that attempts to describe what is given to us in experience, without any obscuring preconceptions or hypothetical speculations (Husserl, 1970). Spiegelberg (1970) defines phenomenology as, "...the direct investigation and description of phenomena as consciously experienced, without theories about their causal explanation and as free as possible from unexamined preconceptions and presuppositions" (p. 810). The above two simple definitions make it clear that instead of making intellectual speculations about reality, phenomenology advocates to a pure description of "what is". In short, phenomenology turns away from a priori assumptions and theory to describe the subjective experiences without hypothesizing or imposing itself onto another’s understanding.

Phenomenology seeks to arrive at the essence of the noema. Through descriptive language, phenomenology identifies phenomena how the subjects perceive them in a given situation. It is a powerful tool for understanding subjective experiences, gaining insights into people’s motivations and actions, and looking through culture-specific assumptions and indigenous wisdom. Free from hypotheses or preconceptions, phenomenological research seeks essentially to describe rather than explain (Husserl 1970). To this effect, a wide variety of methods are used in phenomenological approach that include interviews, conversations, participant observation, action research, focus meetings and analysis of personal texts; in short, minimum structure and maximum depth without any theoretical and researcher bias (Gorden, 1969; Oakley, 1981 & Plummer, 1983; Measor, 1985).

The need for phenomenological approach

Phenomenology was relatively not known outside the philosophical settings before the advent of postmodern thinking. In the last few decades, its implications to psychology and other social sciences have been slowly realised (Kearney, 1984). The three European psychiatrists, Jaspers, Boss and Binswanger, were the first to apply the work of Husserl and Heidegger to make an existential approach to therapy and psychopathology (Mills, 1999).

Today there is a tendency among many psychologists to reduce inter-human situation to mere scientific scores; also commit a mistake of treating a theory as a metaphysical assertion. This way of wrong classification of relative or approximate knowledge as absolute knowledge prevents the possibility of getting fresh data. The point I want to stress here is, conventional psychology seeks to experimentally quantify human relations and ignores often the subjective understanding and experiencing the stimuli and responding. This distinction between objective and subjective vanishes in phenomenological questioning where the emphasis is on the subjective nature of all experiences.

Phenomenological approach is more appropriate for counselling and psychotherapy not only because phenomenology is about searching, describing human experiences as it appears but also it studies life-world of people as it appears and as people experience. Belief-systems, that is, the belief of faith and the worldview that the patient and the community holds as the innermost cultural, spiritual, psychological resources for healing, are important factors for counselling psychotherapy process (Richards & Bergin, 1997).

The effectiveness of therapy depends to a large extent on the quality of the relationship between the client and therapist. The better the rapport between therapist and client, better the outcome of therapy. This trust or rapport is possible only when a therapist has the openness to conceptualise cliental experiences. It is a known fact that the various schools of counselling and therapy originate from specific worldviews and theoretical frameworks. How a professional therapist classifies clients’ presenting problems are found in DSM IV and such causes and cures are the creations of Western stereotypes and worldview. In contrast, native healers, shamans and other less professional therapists cling on to the belief system and life-world in healing process, and such a practice is appealing to millions even today (Janetius, 2003).

In counselling and psychotherapy, culture is understood to pose a barrier to quality therapy (Santos, 1998). Psychologists are slowly becoming aware of the fact that people from different ethno-cultural groups do indeed have unique thinking, behaviour and personality patterns, entirely different from what the generalized Euro-American psychological theories suggest (Trimble, 2000). These Western counselling and therapy modules do not fit to the need of people from another culture. Therefore, an effective therapist should work in harmony with background influences of human condition specifically the tradition, life-world, environmental and geographic conditions of the clients. I am of the opinion that it is necessary that cross-cultural approach should be replaced by culture-specific approach in identifying human conditions, cliental problems and therapeutic interventions. It is here that phenomenology puts its leg strong.

Cross-cultural and Culture-specific approach: We can make a difference between culture-specific psychology and cross-cultural psychology, or, to be specific, culture-specific approach and cross-cultural approach. Cross-cultural psychology views culture simply as a site of variations for human behaviour, whereas, culture-specific psychology considers culture as the birthplace for psychological processes, an essential tool in therapy. Therefore, psychologists are becoming aware of cultural relativism and focus increasingly on cultural contextualization in understanding and answering human behaviour and mental health issues (Cole, 1996). It is true that the diagnostic manual of mental disorders (DSM-IV) that is widely used as a standardised tool of classification of mental sickness encourages clinicians to be culturally sensitive in their therapeutic approaches. However, the classifications in DSM IV itself are cross-cultural. As Bruner (1990) points out,

"Scientific psychology . . . will achieve a more effective stance toward the culture at large when it comes to recognize that the folk psychology of ordinary people is not just a set of self-assuaging illusions, but the culture's beliefs and working hypotheses about what makes it possible and fulfilling for people to live together. . . It is where psychology starts and wherein it is inseparable from anthropology . . . " (p. 32).

Postmodern counsellors and psychotherapists identify the deficiency in cross-cultural counselling and they stress the need to understand human phenomena in relation to specific culture rather than accepting generalized universal truths (Yeo, 2000). Therefore, to be a competent therapist one should be open to the subjective cultural concepts, ethnic identities, and develop culture-specific approaches in order to understand the patients. This awareness and focus on culture-specific psychology makes phenomenology applicable in understanding and helping clients from different socio-cultural background in their specific culture. In short, culture-specific psychology opens vistas for ‘less pre-conceptions, less hypothesizing, out of presupposition and assumptions’, therefore, I would say, a competent culture-specific therapist should be a phenomenologist.

Applying phenomenology in Counselling

Postmodern thinkers identify existential situatedness as a factor in which our being presents itself to awareness and the human individual and surrounding environment are intertwined. Human beings can’t be isolated from history, culture and language. Due to this fact, phenomenology has become a clinical method that explores the quality of lived experiences (Frie, 2003). As Heidegger (1962) points out "to let that which shows itself be seen from itself in the very way in which it shows itself from itself" (p. 58). Due to this fact, from the traditional psychoanalysis to the present day transpersonal approach, we can see psychologists trying to apply phenomenology to both research and practice.

For example, Freudian Psychoanalysis has phenomenological approach in its therapy. As Merleau-Ponty (1979) points out, " It would be a mistake to imagine that even with Freud, psychoanalysis rules out the description of psychological motives, and is opposed to the phenomenological method; psychoanalysis has, on the contrary … as Freud puts it, that every human action has a meaning" (p. 158). In psychoanalysis the therapist by way of free associations gives attention to anything that comes to awareness. Here, psychoanalysis is very similar to the phenomenological method. However, we can establish some differences in psychoanalysis and phenomenological interpretation: in psychoanalysis all data are interpreted by its own theoretical assumptions, whereas phenomenological approach insists subjects interpreting their human condition from their own life-world.

When talking about phenomenological approach in counselling and psychotherapy, I would like to highlight two concepts from anthropology: Etic and Emic. Human condition could be studied from two basic viewpoints, namely emic and etic. Emic approach seeks to understand from the view of its adherents, while the etic approach does the same but by means of analytical tools and concepts drawn from outside (Pelto & Pelto, 1978). An etic approach understands the phenomenon cross-culturally where as emic approach understands culture-specifically. Studying culture according to pre-established etic procedures impedes the discovery of cultural diversity, whereas emic analysis broadens the view (Headland, Pike & Harris, 1990). Moreover, the emic approach focuses on studying socio-cultural phenomena from within a specific cultural context and understanding, as the people from within that culture understand it (Gudykunst, 1997).

Let me pinpoint two specific areas, namely, research and practice where phenomenology can be applied to human condition in counselling and psychotherapy.

Research: There is a misconception among many social science research scholars that scientific research means ‘experimental research or quantitative research’. Many scholars have prejudice towards qualitative or descriptive methodology. It is because as Heppner, Kivlighan, and Wampold (1992) point out, descriptive or qualitative research does not fit the "pure science myth" (p. 194) of the experimental research mongers who reduce research to quantitative numbers. I fully agree that this is not the forum to argue whether descriptive research or experimental research is superior or qualitative or quantitative. However, many social scientists agree the fact that quantitative methods are not privileged over qualitative methods or experimental methods over naturalistic approaches (Braud & Anderson, 1998). Besides this, descriptive research allows researchers to understand many variables more fully and to develop more worthwhile and useful studies. Therefore, social science researchers are becoming aware of the important place that descriptive qualitative research holds in the process of understanding the situatedness of people and to work within a framework of description and discovery. Qualitative research designs, drawn from anthropological and other social science research methods, depend on the written or spoken words and/or observable behaviours as data sources (Bloland, 1992). Phenomenological approach fits well into descriptive qualitative research because it involves observation and description of variables as they are distributed throughout a population.

Phenomenological research differs from ethnographic research. Ethnographic research involves observation and description of phenomena within a specific setting (Wiersma, 1995). The purpose of ethnographic research is to observe and document what occurs in particular setting without manipulating variables or imposing structure. Ethnographic research is not concerned with providing contextual data. Therefore the emphasis is on observation and description of what occurs without pre-conceived hypotheses. Such research may generate hypotheses throughout the data-collection process and/or focus observations around these hypotheses (Wiersma, 1995). While there is not control over extraneous variables as in analogue research, some (Smith & Glass, 1987) argue that it is the "naturalness" that enhances the validity of such research. Phenomena are observed and documented within a specific environmental context. Analyses may involve some quantification, such as proportions or percentages, but primarily rely upon qualitative descriptions of the phenomena of interest. Phenomenological research is similar to ethnographic research, but goes further gaining the subjects’ understandings of environments, involvements, and experiences. Thus, phenomenological researchers collect data by interviewing and asking the subjects how they experience specific phenomena. Bracketing, that is, the deferment of the researcher’s personal prejudices and biases and horizontalization, that is, treating all data as if it were equally important, are the specific tools used (Heppner et al., 1992).

Practice: In every counselling and therapy session, when a therapist and client meet, there is a cross-cultural communication taking place; regardless of the racial educational or socio-economic similarities between the two parties (Owen, 1989). Rigid etic approach or perspective creates this cross-cultural communication. When the therapist allows the client to define the problem to the client’s own satisfaction, cross-cultural outlook gives room for culture specific outlook and this phenomenological outlook was brought out by Carl Rogers (Rogers 1951).

In dealing with healing and therapy Castillo (1997) identifies disease-centred and client-centred approach. A disease-centred approach focuses on the symptoms observed and then makes a diagnosis. A client-centred approach on the other hand, focuses on the patient’s worldview, how the client defines the illness and what the patient believes to be the cause of the illness. Consequently, a client-centred approach focuses on culture-sensitive assessment.

Let me give you a therapy situation: Mr. X comes to me with two specific symptoms as presenting problems. a) his deceased father appears in dreams; b) he is not able to sleep. For a disease-centred therapist, here is a client who is not able to sleep and the therapy should be focused on helping the client to sleep well. Here, a specific subjective experience of Mr. X is not considered as a unique experience rather it is considered a common symptom of sleep disorder. However, in the client-centred or phenomenological approach, it is not so. As Panos and Panos (2000) pinpoint, offering a culture-sensitive therapeutic assessment will consider: What are the dominant cultural values and belief systems of the client? How does the client describe his experience of seeing his deceased father? How does the client define sleeping problem? What are the client’s beliefs about the cause of sleeplessness? It is here, the salient feature of phenomenology is applied in counselling and psychotherapy.

Although all the five therapy approaches I mentioned in the beginning of the paper do make use of phenomenological approach in one way or another, humanistic-existential therapy and transpersonal therapies are highly popular phenomenology based therapies.

Humanistic-Existential approach: Based on the worldview, philosophy, people and their existence, humanistic-existential approaches deal with important life themes. These themes include living and dying, freedom, responsibility to self and others, finding meaning in life, and dealing with a sense of meaninglessness. More than other kinds of therapists, existential therapists examine consciousness, individuals’ awareness of themselves and their ability to look beyond their immediate problems and daily events to problems of human existence.

The first existential therapists were European psychiatrists trained in psychoanalysis who were dissatisfied with Freud's emphasis on biological drives and unconscious processes. Existential therapists help their clients confront and explore anxiety, loneliness, despair, fear of death, and the feeling that life is meaningless. There are few techniques specific to existential therapy. Therapists normally draw on techniques from a variety of therapies. One well-known existential therapy is logotherapy, developed by Austrian psychiatrist Viktor E. Frankl in the 1940s.

Person-centred therapy, originally called client-centred therapy, is perhaps the best-known form of phenomenology-based therapy. American psychologist Carl Rogers developed it in the 1940s and 1950s. Rogers believed that within each person is the capacity for self-understanding and constructive change. In this form of counselling and psychotherapy people are helped toward growth, maturity, and life enrichment in their own perspective rather than the clinician.

Transpersonal approach: Transpersonal approach is an emerging trend in psychology. Transpersonal approach explicitly addresses the subjective human experiences. Thus transpersonal psychotherapy emerges above the medical model of remedial work and handles spiritual issues too. It can also be identified as a bridge between the eastern and western belief system integrated in psychotherapy.

The word transpersonal comes from two words: trans (beyond or through) and persona (mask or façade). At first transpersonal approach in psychology and psychotherapy became widely used to refer to any human experience related to religion, spirituality, meditation and mysticism (Daniels, 1998). However, today it covers a wider variety of subjective phenomena, not necessarily religious or spiritual. It is also a process of harmonious blending of subjective experiences in psychology, which are often neglected by traditional, conventional therapeutic approaches. From the many definitions and views of transpersonal psychology, Lajoie & Shapiro (1992) identify the following five elements as the basic characteristics of transpersonal psychology. They are: (a) an interest in states of consciousness, (b) concern with humanity’s highest or ultimate potential, (c) human experience that goes beyond ego or personal self, (d) the idea of transcendence, and (e) a spiritual dimension in human life.

Abraham Maslow, the architect of humanistic psychology, is considered one of the pioneers of transpersonal psychology. The great importance Maslow gave to self-actualization, peak experiences etc as the highest attainable motivations and goals of humans, place him as the great explorer of the transpersonal in human beings (Walsh & Vaughan, 1993). In the theories of Carl Rogers, Fritz Perls and Viktor Frankle too, transpersonal ideas are seen although not identified purely as such.

A transpersonal approach sees human beings as intuitive, mystical, psychic and spiritual (Hendricks & Weinhold, 1982). Psychology considers development and the formation of a stable, integrated, and individuated ego as the goal of human development and mental health whereas transpersonal psychology exceeds such description of psychological theories and explores stages of personality development that extend beyond the individual ego into transpersonal realms (Wilber, 2000). However, it is important to distinguish bizarre phenomenon from transpersonal experience or phenomenon. Daniels (1998) argues that any event or experience or phenomenon that has a transformational meaning or effect on a person can be considered subject matter for transpersonal psychology. Therefore wide ranges of paranormal experiences are included in the subject matter of transpersonal psychology.

Conclusion

Today there is a great awareness among psychologists and postmodern thinkers to move from cross-cultural paradigm to culture-specific in understanding human condition. Phenomenology comes in as a qualitative research method as well as therapeutic modality to facilitate clients to make sense of their life-world. Thus, with the help of emic understanding, grounded in phenomenological approach, we can better the therapist-client relationship, genuine understanding of life-world and thus resolve wide varieties of personal problems.

References

Bloland, P. A. (1992). Qualitative research in student affairs. Los Angeles, CA: University of California at Los Angeles.

Braud. W. & Anderson. R. (1998). Transpersonal research methods for the social sciences. New Delhi: Sage Publications.

Bruner, J. ( 1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Castillo, R. J. (1997). Cultural assessment. "In" R. J. Castillo, Culture and mental illness (pp. 55-75). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.

Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Daniels, M. (1998). Transpersonal psychology and the paranormal. Transpersonal Psychology Review, 2(3), 17-31.

Frie, R. (2003). (Ed.) Understanding experience. New York: Routledge.

Gorden, R. L. (1969). Interviewing: Strategy, Techniques and Tactics Homewood Ill, Dorsey Press.

Gudykunst, W. B. (1997). Cultural variability in communication. Communication Research, 24 (4): 327-348.

Headland, T. N. Pike K. L., & Harris M. (1990). (Ed.). "Emics" and "Etics": The insider/outsider debate. London: Sage Publications.

Hendricks, G., & Weinhold, B. (1982). Transpersonal approaches to counseling and psychotherapy. London: Love Publishing Company.

Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time. Oxford, Basil Blackwell.

Heppner, P. P., Kivlighan, D. M., & Wampold, B. E. (1992). Research design in counselling. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.

Husserl, E. (1970). Logical investigations New York, Humanities Press

Janetius, S. T. (2003). The emerging worldview of Cordillera indigenous peoples of selected provinces: implications for psychotherapy. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. De La Salle University, Manila, Philippines.

Kearney, R. (1984). Dialogues with contemporary continental thinkers. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

Krippner, S. (1988). Shamans: The first healers. In G. Doore (Ed.), Shaman's path: Healing, personal growth and empowerment (pp. 101-114). Boston, MA: Shambala Publications.

Lajoie, D. H., & Shapiro, S. I. (1992). Definitions of transpersonal psychology: The first twenty-three years. Journal of Transpersonal Psychology, 24(1), 79-98.

Measor, L. (1985). "Interviewing: a Strategy in Qualitative Research" in R Burgess (ed) Strategies of Educational Research: Qualitative Methods. Lewes: Falmer Press

Merleau-Ponty, M. (1979). Phenomenology of perception. The humanities press. N.J.

Mills. J. (1999). In search of a method: New directions in philosophical counselling. Paper presented at Canadian Society for Philosophical Practice, Ontario Philosophical Association, Guelph, Ontario.

Oakley, A. (1981) "Interviewing women: a contradiction in terms" in H Roberts (ed) Doing Feminist Research. London, Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Owen, R. I. (1989). The application of some ideas from anthroplogy to counselling, therapy and cross-cultural counselling. British Association for Counselling and the American Association for Counselling Development. Uxbridge: Uxbridge University, June as sited in http://www.wlv.ac.uk/~cs1869/publication/UXBRIDGE.html

Panos, P. T., & Panos, A. J. (2000). A model for a culture-sensitive assessment of patients in health care settings. Social Work in Health Care, 31(1), 49-62.

Pelto, P. J., & Pelto. G. H. (1978). Units of observation: "Emic" and "Etic" approaches. "In" Anthropological research: The structure of inquiry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Plummer, K. (1983) Documents of Life: an introduction to the problems and literature of a humanistic method. London, Unwin Hyman.

Richards, P. S., & Bergin, A. E. (1997). A Spiritual strategy for counseling and psychotherapy. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.

Rogers, C.R. (1951) Client-centred therapy. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

Santos, D. (1998). Multicultural perspective in three international schools in the Philippines. "In" Bernado, (Ed.), Understanding behavior bridging cultures (pp 159 – 166). Manila: De La Salle University Press.

Smith, M. L., & Glass, G. V. (1987). Research and evaluation in education and the social sciences. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Spiegelberg, H. (1970) Phenomenology, in: Encyclopaedia Britannica, vol. 17 (14th ed), pp. 810-812. (Chicago, Encyclopaedia Britannica).

Trimble, J. E. (2000). Considering the cultures within. Retrieved October 14, 2001 from

http://www.radcliffe.edu/quarterly/200004/hidden-6.html

Walsh, R., & Vaughan, F. (Eds.). (1993). Paths beyond ego: The transpersonal vision. LA: Tarcher-Putnam.

Wilber, K. (2000). Sex, ecology, spirituality: The spirit of evolution (2nd rev. ed.). Boston: Shambhala.

Wiersma, W. (1995). Research methods in education (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

Yeo, A. (2000). Counseling trends in postmodernist thinking in counseling. "In" Clemeña (Ed.), Counseling in Asia (pp. 6-19). Manila: De La Salle University Press.

Posted on July 10, 2003